Thursday, April 10, 2008

What Am I part3

Embryonic Stem Cells-

This is from the Republican candidates web site.(John McCain) Stem cell research offers tremendous hope for those suffering from a variety of deadly diseases - hope for both cures and life-extending treatments. However, the compassion to relieve suffering and to cure deadly disease cannot erode moral and ethical principles.

For this reason, John McCain opposes the intentional creation of human embryos for research purposes. To that end, Senator McCain voted to ban the practice of "fetal farming," making it a federal crime for researchers to use cells or fetal tissue from an embryo created for research purposes. Furthermore, he voted to ban attempts to use or obtain human cells gestated in animals. Finally, John McCain strongly opposes human cloning and voted to ban the practice, and any related experimentation, under federal law.(added note:This is the Christian stance, relates to abortion.)

As president, John McCain will strongly support funding for promising research programs, including amniotic fluid and adult stem cell research and other types of scientific study that do not involve the use of human embryos.

Where federal funds are used for stem cell research, Senator McCain believes clear lines should be drawn that reflect a refusal to sacrifice moral values and ethical principles for the sake of scientific progress, and that any such research should be subject to strict federal guidelines.

This is from the Democrat candidate's website. (Barrack Obama)Embryonic stem cells can be obtained from a number of sources, including in vitro fertilization. At this very moment, there are over 400,000 embryos being stored in over 400 facilities throughout the United States. The majority of these are reserved for infertile couples. However, many of these embryos will go unused, destined for permanent storage in a freezer or disposal. We should expand and accelerate research using these embryos, just as we should continue to explore the viability of adult stem cell use and cord blood use.

All over the country, exciting progress is being made in the area of embryonic stem cell research. At the University of Illinois, they're finding that stem cells have the potential to treat blood disorders, lung diseases, and heart damage.

At Johns Hopkins, researchers were able to use mouse embryonic stem cells to repair damaged nerves and restore mobility in paralyzed rats. One can't help but think that it's a matter of when, not if, this research will be able to one day help those who have lost the ability to walk.

For these reasons, I'm proud to be a long-term supporter of greater stem cell research. While I was a member of the Illinois Senate, I was the chief cosponsor of the Ronald Reagan Biomedical Research Act, which would specifically permit embryonic stem cell research in Illinois, and establish review of this research by the Illinois Department of Public Health.

And I'm proud to be a cosponsor of the stem cell bill before us today. This bill embodies the innovative thinking that we as a society demand and medical advancement requires. By expanding scientific access to embryonic stem cells which would be otherwise discarded, this bill will help our nation's scientists and researchers develop treatments and cures to help people who suffer from illnesses and injuries for which there are currently none. But the bill is not without limits; it requires that scientific research also be subject to rigorous oversight.

I realize there are moral and ethical issues surrounding this debate......we're talking about using those stem cells to possibly save the lives of millions of Americans.

The concluded stance that I see, The Republican view is the more Christian view of the two.

Republican 3
Democrat 1

1 comment:

Tess Rinehart said...

Should we even be discussing whether one political party is more "Christian" than another? This not only seems narrow-minded, but is also not in line with what our founding fathers had in mind for our country(http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/Psychology/amr/amerc.htm). To try to judge whether any political party is Christian or not is short-sighted. How Christian is "Christian enough"? What denomination's beliefs should we use to judge? What standards does one use to decide? Using only three issues (capitol punishment, abortion, and stem cell research) to make that determination (two, if you lump abortion and stem cell research together, which most Republicans do) is awfully dangerous. I would hate to be judged and pigeonholed based on my beliefs about any three issues alone.
Are there Christian Democrats? Certainly (http://www.liberalslikechrist.org/about/democrat-1.html).
Are there Atheist Republicans? Absolutely (http://www.compleatheretic.com/links/godlessright.html).
Neither Republicans nor Democrats are entirely right or wrong, no matter what measure we use to judge, and we should not base our vote on unrealistic and vague standards.